Has NME blundered by binning Barney?
More than three decades ain’t a bad innings; today IPC Ignite has retired Barney Bubbles’ masthead (which survived in modified form since introduction late in 1978) as part of its latest design overhaul of floundering music weekly NME.

The new block colour version is being hammered home with 10 different covers fronting a glossy look overseen by editor Krissi Murison and realised by the magazine’s art director Joe Frost.

Murison was appointed six months ago to wrestle the magazine’s reputation from the “indie Heat” phase instituted by media-hungry predecessor Conor McNicholas and, more importantly, address the digital-era bugbears plaguing every print publishing sector: faltering advertising and sinking circulation.

Early issues with Barney's logo, including (right) the very first: December 2, 1978
Murison describes the new design as “much more mature and aspirational” with “content which focuses on being in-depth, opinionated and above all knowledgeable”.

Ad campaign for 1978 redesign. Photograph: Brian Griffin.
This is familiar to music media watchers; why, less than 10 years ago, the NME announced it was moving towards Rolling Stone territory at a time when the post-Britpop slump resulted in weekly sales falling from above 100,000 to 70,000 copies.

Logo in use in the mid-80s.
In fact, that didn’t last. Less than two years later McNicholas reversed the design approach, driving the magazine into a celeb/gossip dead-end.
These days the NME’s official weekly sale is around 38,000, having fallen an alarming 20% last year.
It was all very different when Barney was brought on board in the late summer of 1978. The music press was booming on the back of post-punk, with the NME’s sales sometimes approaching 200,000 copies a week. Barney’s layout harmonisation, decluttering of the chart and cleaning up of the house style is detailed in Reasons To Be Cheerful and expanded upon here.

First issue to feature Barney's redesign, October 7, 1978. IPC management refused to replace the old masthead for six weeks.
But in 2010, when the NME is clearly flailing for credibility and Barney’s star is in the ascendant – on average we are contacted by, or told about, two or three young designers who are inspired by his work every week – is it entirely wise to ditch a property with such beneficial associations?
Only time will tell, though it is amusing to reflect that the NME logo font which lasted so long was, in fact, pinched from the signage on a warehouse close to Barney’s Old Street studio way back in the late 70s.
Tags: Conor McNicholas, IPC Ignite, Joe Frost, Krissi Murison, NME, Old Street





April 7th, 2010 at 11:07 am
Perhaps we should revive an OldME faithful to Barney. My house is adorned with many of his images.
April 7th, 2010 at 12:11 pm
Shame, but, a bit like Radio1, it’s been a number of years since the NME was in any way relevant. As George Harrison once said, All Things Must Pass.
April 7th, 2010 at 12:42 pm
True enough John.
And you can’t blame them for redesigning or even relieving BB’s masthead of it’s duty after so long; that’s publishing, particularly when trying to reposition the print edition as the centrepiece of a digital portfolio. It just struck me that now would be the time to build associations to an established and thoroughly credible figure like BB rather than jettison him completely.
April 7th, 2010 at 2:09 pm
It’s just too bad they couldn’t have used some imagination. I appreciate the cleaner overall look, but i also pretty much looks like every other music/fashion/lifestyle/marketing-genre-ad-nauseum magazine out there right now.
April 10th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
it could have been reworked a bit and be just as ‘aspirational’. But it would seem the latest crew as NME prefer Woman’s Wear Daily for ‘inspiration’.